AP World History: Modern Unit 6: Consequences of Industrialization (c. 1750–1900) practice questions

Question 1

You're a European imperial official in 1880. You're taking someone else's land, exploiting their labor, and extracting their resources. But you don't FEEL like a villain — because you've built an entire ideological framework that says you're HELPING them. What are these justifications?

Rationales: Social Darwinism, nationalism, civilizing mission. Every one served a single purpose: making exploitation sound noble rather than greedy.

Accepted Answer

Rationales: Social Darwinism, nationalism, civilizing mission. Every one served a single purpose: making exploitation sound noble rather than greedy.

Answer

Europeans openly admitted imperialism was purely about profit

Answer

Only economic motivations drove imperialism; ideology played no role

Answer

Non-European societies invited European colonization voluntarily

Question 2

Darwin says species compete and the fittest survive — in BIOLOGY. Then someone twists that into: 'Strong NATIONS are meant to dominate weak ones. It's just nature.' How does misapplying science justify imperialism?

Accepted Answer

Social Darwinism — fittest nations 'deserve' to dominate. It turned a political choice (conquering others) into a supposed natural law, dressing up racism as science.

Answer

A legitimate scientific theory about biological evolution

Answer

A philosophy promoting equality among all races and nations

Answer

An economic theory about free markets and competition

Question 3

'We're not STEALING your resources — we're HELPING you! We're bringing education, medicine, Christianity, and civilization!' Europeans frame imperialism as CHARITY. What's this ideology, and how do you see through it on the exam?

Accepted Answer

The civilizing mission — exploitation reframed as charity. Also called 'the White Man's Burden,' it always meant replacing indigenous cultures with European ones.

Answer

A genuine humanitarian effort with no economic motivations

Answer

A philosophy that promoted preserving indigenous cultures

Answer

A scientific theory about technological progress

Question 4

In 1884, European powers sit around a table in Berlin and literally DRAW LINES on a map of Africa, dividing the entire continent among themselves. Not a single African representative is invited. What is this event, and what drives it?

Accepted Answer

The Berlin Conference (1884-85), kicking off the Scramble for Africa. Drivers: industrialization demanded raw materials (rubber, diamonds, copper). Nationalism made colonies symbols of prestige. The conference set 'rules' for dividing Africa — as if the continent was an unclaimed prize rather than home to millions of people.

Answer

African leaders were invited and participated in the Berlin Conference

Answer

Africa was already divided into European colonies before 1750

Answer

European interest in Africa was purely humanitarian

Question 5

King Leopold II runs the Congo as his PERSONAL property. His rubber regime kills an estimated 10 million people. The scandal is so horrific that other imperial powers force Belgium to take it away. What pattern does this show?

Accepted Answer

The private-to-state shift — scandalous private colonies became state-run. Leopold's Congo and the Dutch East Indies show it; state control meant more accountable, not gentler, rule.

Answer

All colonies were always directly controlled by governments from the start

Answer

Private companies gave up colonies voluntarily out of moral concern

Answer

Government takeover always improved conditions for colonized peoples

Question 6

The exam says 'European imperialism' but that's not the whole picture. The U.S. expands westward across North America. Russia pushes east across Siberia. Japan conquers Korea. Same pattern, different geography. What do all three share with European imperialism?

Accepted Answer

All three are industrial states conquering neighboring territory by force. The U.S. calls it Manifest Destiny, Russia civilizing Central Asia, Japan its Co-Prosperity Sphere — same imperialism.

Answer

Only European states expanded their territories during this period

Answer

The U.S., Russia, and Japan were victims of imperialism, not practitioners

Answer

Japan's expansion occurred in the 20th century, not the 19th

Question 7

In most colonies, Europeans extract resources and leave. But in some places — New Zealand, South Africa, Australia — they send their OWN citizens to live there permanently, displacing indigenous peoples. What's the difference between these two models?

Accepted Answer

Extraction colonies exploit from afar; settler colonies displace, stay. Extraction takes resources (most of Africa); settlement moves Europeans in permanently (Australia, South Africa).

Answer

All colonies were settler colonies with permanent European populations

Answer

Settler colonies existed only in the Americas, never in Africa or Oceania

Answer

Indigenous peoples willingly relocated to make room for settlers

Question 8

Empires expand. People get conquered. The exam asks: 'Did they just accept it?' The answer is NEVER yes. What two main forms did anti-colonial resistance take?

Accepted Answer

Direct military resistance and state-building on the periphery. Armies fought back (1857 India, Samory Touré) while new states formed outside imperial control (Sokoto, Zulu) — both show agency.

Answer

Colonized peoples universally accepted imperial rule without resistance

Answer

Resistance movements only used peaceful protest, never military force

Answer

Anti-colonial movements didn't emerge until the 20th century

AP World History: Modern — Unit 6: Consequences of Industrialization (c. 1750–1900)

What AP World History: Modern Unit 6 covers

AP World History: Modern Unit 6 practice questions

Key terms in Unit 6

Drill all of Unit 6 with spaced repetition